AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (95) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Vietnam Cleverly Outsmarts trumps trade war
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Market TalkMessage format
 
havin’funfarming
Posted 4/23/2025 03:47 (#11199159 - in reply to #11199130)
Subject: RE: Vietnam Cleverly Outsmarts trumps trade war


Earlier you said that you think that most of the left are now worried about being on a slippery slope after the LGBTQ attacks. In a similar vein I mentioned a circumstance where there is a concern amongst the right that the LGBTQ movement is a slippery slope in and of itself. As of yet there is no limit to what the LGTBQ community will try to force the general public to accept. That is a slippery slope. There has already been an attempt to make pedophilia accepted. That is a fact, not an extreme view. It may have failed this time but, like every other variety of sexual preference already within the LGBTQ community, if that community decides it is another sexual variety, the general public will be required to accept it or be considered guilty of some form on unacceptable hatred. Thst is not an extremist view. It is reality. You yourself have already commented on the right being unaccepting of others and have commented on LGBTQ attacks. Incredibly few on the right are guilty of the type of behaviour you mention. If any of this is to be considered entering extreme territory we are both guilty of it.

Your assessment of DEI is evidence of the difference in the type of thinking that I had mentioned. You are saying that the rights issue with DEI has to do with race and gender. DEI is a movement created by the left specifically to make race and gender a qualification in the hiring process. In other words, DEI was literally created as a means to both include AND exclude eligibility for hire based on race and gender. That is literally the exact type of situation that you are accusing the right of doing.

The problem that the right has with DEI is literally the fact that it DOES introduce race and gender as a factor in hiring. Those opposed to DEI think that the most qualified person should be hired. You are assuming, incorrectly I will add, that the right is as concerned about a persons gender and race as those on the left. In general they are not.

I don’t agree with your assessment of who will vote or not vote because there are extremists on both sides that will vote and some that won’t. Some people on both sides will vote for their side simply because they always have and won’t change even if they dislike their current candidate. Your assessment of Trump is a personal opinion and not an absolute truth. There’s nothing wrong with that as we all have our own opinions. Mine is different for a variety of reasons, some of which I mentioned above. We all think differently and we shouldn’t assume the reason for others opinion because the metrics used to assess a situation might be different than our own. We need to ask, and if a reasonable answer given accept, the reasoning given for a persons opinions. We shouldn’t judge them based on our own way of thinking. For the most part people on both sides mean well even if it doesn’t appear so.
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)