|
| If that were true you two would be equals because you have not presented anything except for the “my side is right” argument.
Unfortunately for you, she presented a lot of science and reasoning at a much deeper level than you have. You have not offered anything of any scientific intellect other than the standard “my guy is right and yours is a quack” response.
You will not be able to know if you are the quack because you refuse to even acknowledge that you might not know everything. She talked about how in her medical practice she had also been that oblivious to the lack of validity of what she had learned in her medical training. She was just parroting what she had been told to. When she was forced to dig deeper she learned and grew to realize she actually had not known the truth. She said she actually felt ashamed for the poor treatment she had provided for her patients up to that point.
A requirement of learning is a person admitting and accepting that they don’t know. That is the first step.
You should listen to Joe Rohan’s podcast.
Edited by havin’funfarming 4/13/2025 02:27
| |
|
Measles
