|
| Ok. So basically one biased person upset that a podcaster has the opposite bias. You just admitted that your bias prevented you from listening to the science she was talking about. A person that believes he knows everything is unable to learn that he doesn’t.
As of now all you have offered is how you believe your experts are correct and she is wrong. I am not interested in your beliefs any more than you are interested in mine. What I am interested in is are you able to explain the science that proves her wrong. As I said before if someone wants to discredit her claims but can’t do that they have no way of knowing that they are not the quack.
There are experts with strong, but opposite beliefs about these topics that are far more knowledgeable than you or I. While we can both believe whatever experts we choose to, based on our biases, but those are just our own biased beliefs.
It was that type of extreme bias from people who had the belief but not the intelligence to explain the science that caused people to question the self proclaimed “settled” science. | |
|
Measles
