AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (94) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Vaccine data. Draw your own conclusions
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Kitchen TableMessage format
 
havin’funfarming
Posted 4/12/2025 09:18 (#11186642 - in reply to #11179953)
Subject: RE: Vaccine data. Draw your own conclusions


What you said is true to a point. With all of the controversy around the vaccines people will be much more aware and apt to report it as such. That will undoubtedly increase the number of reports in the public system of reporting.

In a similar vein, medical professionals were being made very aware that their livelihoods depended upon supporting vaccinations. That would have a similar effect of lowering the number of professionals willing to lay the blame on the shots unless they were absolutely certain.

The causes of death are all normal things that people can die from so the assessment is subject to bias. Everyone knows that an 60 year old person can have a heart attack. It would take a thorough autopsy to determine if the shot was a factor. That means that even in those cases a medical professional is making the determination which means that the bias in the professional sector still applies at some level.

In the case of Covid it is almost a certainty that both sides are correct when they claim that the other sides data is biased. It is also almost a certainty that they shouldn’t place as much trust in their own biased data as they do. I am not arguing with everything you said as much as saying that the types of issues you said applies to both sides of this argument. The lack of unbiased data on both sides of this issue has been the problem all along.

For anyone that wants to hear a very, very interesting view on the entire vaccination industry there is an extremely interesting interview recently on Joe Rogan. He interviewed Suzanne Humphries. Episode #2294 on Spotify. It is seriously worth listening to.

I may as well be preemptive and add that she may not be correct on every issue she talks about, just like any other professional, but she certainly isn’t a quack. Anyone that wants to claim she is a quack needs to back that up and explain how they know they themselves aren’t the quack.

I listen to podcasts from a wide variety of sources on a wide variety of topics like this anytime I drive. I also listen to them with noise cancelling headsets in equipment and with noise cancelling earbuds when working in the shop.

Edited by havin’funfarming 4/12/2025 10:03
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)