Hilltop Husker - 4/4/2025 14:36

It was literally the post above yours. In nested View.

The graph doesn't show a massive amount more miscarriages. That's the problem with the graph.

That graph shows people reporting still born births they believe are possibly caused by vaccine. Not the total amount of still births. We don't know if there was a spike in still birth or not those years from this graph. That is why we need the large group analysis data I mentioned to see if it correlates or not. There was an increase in vaccines received in that period of time. Many millions more people received vaccine. This graph one can't tell us many things. We can't know if a certain percentage of all vaccines cause still birth or that people who have a still birth are looking for more explanation and want the possibility investigated thus the reporting. Or that there is a link between this and the covid vaccine. Or that the spike protein regardless of source can cause reproduction issue . More analysis is needed. You can't draw any conclusions from this graph alone. We need more data. We dont even know if the covid viral infections caused more miscarriages from this graph.

My post said nothing of not believing there could be a link. Just that this graph alone doesn't give enough information to draw any conclusions. You are banker right? Making a conclusion on this is like seeing an incomplete balance sheet. Just a little bit more information can change the entire thing. That's all I'm getting at. I'm not pushing a narrative or msm lies. Just stating that this single graphic doesn't provide enough data for a final conclusion. If there is a link it needs to be studied. I think we could agree on that. I'm sorry I was not clear enough in my original post.