|
| I completely get where you're coming from. There’s often not enough detail in plot sheets to make confident decisions, especially when you’re managing such diverse soil types and drainage conditions. I know some of the folks who worked on the FBN tool—it had a great concept, but as you mentioned, the challenge was accounting for the many variables between operations.
The tool we’re working on takes a different approach. Instead of modeling recommendations like FBN, it simply breaks trial environments into smaller, digestible chunks so users can analyze placement and optimization more effectively. The goal is to provide clear, data-backed insights on how a variety performs across different trial environments, making it easier to match the right seed to the right conditions.
How do you typically compare agronomic characteristics when selecting hybrids? Are there specific data points you rely on most? | |
|