|
| I completely agree—large-acre plot data is great for understanding real-world performance, but we don’t always have access to as much of it compared to small plot trials.
I also 100% agree that stable, rugged varieties consistently perform better than "racehorses," which can shine in ideal conditions but struggle under stress. I enjoy searching for those robust varieties that hold up across environments, and the tool we’re working on helps identify how varieties perform in different conditions.
How do you typically analyze your data when comparing varieties across environments? Do you track trends over multiple environments or mainly focus on year-to-year performance? | |
|