Middlesex County, Ontario | mjr05 - 10/16/2024 21:09
He mentions in the video, his % is gallons. So if he used 50 gallons per acre 32%, 86% Green N would be 43 gallons per acre. I don't know why he chose to present it the way he did, it is a little confusing. It all sounds exciting, but still has a tinge of 'too good to be true.' I hope it is true though.
So the 200% Green N rate is 100 gallons per acre? If we interpret the chart that way, and we take the "its a 2% N solution" information that they don't share very readily, then I reach the conclusion that "it takes much less total N to grow the same crop when the N is in this Green N form."
The base comparison is 177 lb/ac actual N in the form of 50 gpa 32% UAN
200% Green N trial is 16.7 lb/ac actual N in the form of 100 gpa Green N
The Green N out yields the UAN at this rate.
Really that's the amazing science discovery here, that they've discovered a new form of N that is 10x more efficient at converting to bushels and is many times more cost efficient at converting to bushels when compared to traditional fertilizers.
It seems like such a simple thing to state outright. "We've discovered a new form of N that is much more efficient and cost effective." Why don't they just say that? That would be an amazing discovery. If they want me to believe their claims then they need to address that this new form of N is so much more efficient.
Wouldn't you like to see 16.7 lb/ac actual N in UAN form on that chart as well? Seems like a no brainer.
All the information is so muddled and terrible at conveyance that I am extremely suspicious that it is intentionally muddled in order to mislead to people who won't convert to actual lb of N.
If its all true then their N cost is ~$4/acre and I can make it at home. That'd be great.
Edited by WildBuckwheat 10/17/2024 08:22
|
Looks like "Green Lightning" works
