| David - 10/4/2024 13:33
I don’t think anyone said they spent all their money on illegals. And no one said they were only getting $750.
Kinda reads that way to me, but I'll grant the $750 limit is more a general picture I've seen people painting and not particularly in this thread.
https://talk.newagtalk.com/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=1175797&mid=10...
https://talk.newagtalk.com/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=1175797&mid=10... (your own post to a twitter video pointing out how much FEMA spent for migrant programs)
https://talk.newagtalk.com/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=1175797&mid=10... (also your own post, to an article that goes as far to say the FEMA funds were misappropriated)
So what's the forest? That money can't be spent at all on migrants? My point is that this particular spending didn't make a statistical difference to the situation. Put that $650 million towards disaster support and they're still going to end up in a shortfall for the season or come awfully close. FEMA funding is a broader issue within the government and even then I don't think it's accurate to say that if we stopped humanitarian funding that suddenly everything would be fixed; it's a much broader issue than just that. |
This flood in the south east makes the buffalo cree flood in W Va in 1972makes the 125 people lost
