|
|
wc mn | thank you for your insightful post. there is much that goes on that us little people dont know or understand, but thinking back to vietnam it is all slowly starting to make sense. JFK and his brother were both killed for reasons I finally am able to figure out. history will be able to tell decades from now the complete shi*show we are witnessing in real time. |
|
| |
|
wc mn | i would think dropping 50 nukes in there would probably fix it.... |
|
| |
|
| I wish I could call what you think as critical thinking but that would be misinformation which I imagine you want banned. Your TDS is causing you to be on the inside looking out, not the outside looking in. |
|
| |
|
| w1891 - 10/3/2024 08:59
But you do know. Good story. Plays well on the campaign trial and in chat rooms. Doesn’t make any logical sense but I am sure you and your type eat this up.
You would be well served to ask how your theory can occur with layers of checks and balances. With all the law enforcement personal in the US, to think that someone holds so much power that they are able to do whatever that want
There will be various layers of checks and balances within the legal system or whatever they call it in North Korea that prevents the average citizen from getting away with anything also. I imagine you realize that Kim is not subject to that same system though don’t you?
But nice try.
Edited by havin’funfarming 10/3/2024 13:48
|
|
| |
|
| Most of the issues the last 4 years have been because of political take of the left. |
|
| |
|
S Illinois | And NK has what to do do with the US legal system? |
|
| |
|
Southeast Colorado | Didn't used to have much. Lately it smells similar. |
|
| |
|
| It provided an example of a corrupt 2 tiered justice system of a tyrannical government that places itself above the law that I was quite sure you would not defend. When you didn’t defend Kim it made it evident that you can see that type of corruption from the outside looking in. Your refusal to recognize and acknowledge the similar actions and behaviours of our own leaders provides an example of someone not being able to see it, or knowingly disregard it, from inside that type of corrupt system.
Edited by havin’funfarming 10/3/2024 21:11
|
|
| |
|
S Illinois | So you just put forth false equivalency that doesn’t actually provide proof but plays on people’s emotions.
Edit: How about actual proof. And you are smart enough to know exactly what you did. Simply take something most agree with aka NK bad and then tie that to the US.
Edited by w1891 10/4/2024 06:07
|
|
| |
|
| Why did they change a law just so Trump could be charged? |
|
| |
|
| I was giving an example of how for some people it is easy to see corruption from the outside of a system looking in but how some of those same people either fail to see it or choose to ignore it when it happens within their own system.
If emotions entered this exchange it is only because I am over the target.
Edited by havin’funfarming 10/4/2024 06:46
|
|
| |
|
Southeast Colorado | 1891 is a good blue Dem. He does not see/ignores the breaking from norms they have done to go after Trump.
For them, he must be stopped at ALL costs. For democracy you know. |
|
| |
|
| No kidding. It is OK to use North Korean level tactics to ensure that the majority of the people can’t choose the leader they want. That is literally their way of saving democracy. They are totally oblivious to the fact that they are the very people subverting democracy with their win at all costs attitude. |
|
| |
|
S Illinois | Here again false equivalency and hyperbole. Do you two actually have anything of substance or are you going to keep talking in platitudes and use innuendo? It’s ok to say you’re a political hack.
Edit: You are doing nothing more than those on the other side who compare Trump to Hitler or the end of democracy’s
Edited by w1891 10/4/2024 08:16
|
|
| |
|
S Illinois | And that law would be? |
|
| |
|
S Illinois | Tell me again what President tried to crucify their VP into doing something unconstitutional. Sucks when you so politically myopic that you give up your own ideals all because of hero worship.
Edited by w1891 10/4/2024 08:19
|
|
| |
|
| E. Jean Carroll |
|
| |
|
| w1891 - 10/4/2024 08:19
Tell me again what President tried to crucify their VP into doing something unconstitutional. Sucks when you so politically myopic that you give up your own ideals all because of hero worship.
Shouldn't you just do your government job |
|
| |
|
Southeast Colorado | w1891 - 10/4/2024 07:19
Tell me again what President tried to crucify their VP into doing something unconstitutional. Sucks when you so politically myopic that you give up your own ideals all because of hero worship.
January 6th was a protest that got out of control. It was not an insurrection. Tell us how many politicians were killed that day.
And it's rather obvious you see nothing wrong with the lawfare being used against Trump. All of you blue idiots don't see it. That's the point of my comment...........and it still applies. |
|
| |
|
S Illinois | That’s what you have? You sound like the type of lawyers he has gotten to defend him. |
|
| |
|
S Illinois | Tweeting that his VP should circumvent the constitution has nothing to do with the protest.
Edit: And before you go all vicim on us, ask yourself if the table were turned would you be ok with the opposition doing that. If you can say yes then your argument has merit. If not you’re just another political hypocrite.
Edited by w1891 10/4/2024 09:04
|
|
| |
|
Southeast Colorado | Publically defying the Supreme Court like Biden constantly does falls into that category as well. But you don't have a problem with that. See, we're even.
And those of us who still see problems with the 2020 election still have issues with those who only wanted to disregard our concerns and hurry past them. |
|
| |
|
| Please tell me why that specific law was changed and who was the first person to use it. |
|
| |
|
| Can you show us the tweet where he told him to circumvent the Constitution? |
|
| |
|
S Illinois | Nothing was hurried past. Hearings and lawsuits were brought incessantly. But nothing came about from them.
It’s should be telling as to the veracity of the cases as to whom was willing to be brought on as council. High profile lawyers would be tripping over themselves to be involved in something like this if there was merit. But they didn’t. The lawyers included second rate, back benchers, little experienced and hits plain nut jobs who told their client want he wanted to hear instead of what he needed to. That data point is more telling than any political slant one want to have. |
|
| |
|
S Illinois | The onus is on you. |
|
| |
|
S Illinois | Donald Trump tweets: “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify. USA demands the truth |
|
| |
|
| Hmm. Do you have actual proof of any of Kim’s corruption? You don’t yet you do not defend him because you are outside of his system and thus see evidence of his corruption.
You are proving what I have set out to prove.
Edited by havin’funfarming 10/4/2024 10:02
|
|
| |
|
S Illinois | Nothing you wrote makes any sense. Lot of word rubbish with not actual point. Try again. |
|
| |
|
| It was changed so she could file suit against Trump. She was the first to use it.
See how easy that was? |
|
| |
|
| Reads to me he wanted to protect the Constitution.
|
|
| |
|
S Illinois | That’s the hill you’re going to and a stand on? A longer statute of limitations change. So no actual merit change just a longer look back period in civil cases not even criminal cases. |
|
| |
|
S Illinois | I am sure it does as there are lots of things you don’t understand. Mike Pence is much more versed in constitutional law than Trump. |
|
| |
|
| w1891 - 10/4/2024 09:15
Donald Trump tweets: “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify. USA demands the truth
still dicking around at work must be nice to have the tax payers pay your salary |
|
| |
|
| Why was it changed to begin with? And why for only one year?
I’m sure you won’t answer and just evade as usual. |
|
| |
|
| Your response is indicative that I’m right over the target. |
|
| |
|
| No doubt. |
|
| |
|
| You just posted a tweet of Trump saying the exact opposite of what you said he did. Your emotions are clouding your vision of reality. |
|
| |
|
| “I am sure it does as there are lots of things you don’t understand.”
****** |
|
| |
|
S Illinois | A simple Trump tweet on a subject does make it a legal act. He was advocating that was not constitutional legal.
Edit: There was no legal precedent for what Trump was advocating. Constitutional scholars of which Pence has access to, said it was not the VP’s power. That is the very definition of advocating for something not legal. Once again Trump tweets don’t automatically become truth or law just because he want it to be that way.
Edited by w1891 10/4/2024 10:43
|
|
| |
|
S Illinois | I am starting to understand why we have so many TW discussions on here. |
|
| |
|
| He is propping up the group of people who doesn’t understand what a woman is and doesn’t support protecting biological women from “women with penises” in their dressing rooms, bathrooms, sports, etc. I hope I never understand the world as clearly as he does. |
|
| |
|
S Illinois | Yep must be over the target if you resorting to those responses |
|
| |
|
| “Sucks when you so politically myopic that you give up your own ideals all because of hero worship.” |
|
| |
|
| Am I not over the target yet again when I say you are propping up the side that understands biology like I mentioned? |
|
| |
Iran unleashing ballistic missiles onto Israel, puts the Administration
