| w1891 - 9/4/2024 06:14
Once again I will ask what data do you have to support this: "there is no doubt who the majority of the public wants in office, Trump". Since you provide none it's not a truth but rather an opinion. Therefore there is a doubt and Trump may win or he may loose and nothing nefarious or behind the scenes will be the cause of that.
If you want to go chase data figure out the average number of people at Trump rallies and the average number of people at Kamala rallies.
Hilltop explained one reason that the most popular person might not get into office although in this case the major metropolitan areas and minority groups are all starting to realize the path the current leadership has put them on, and Kamala will continue, is not a good path. Actually reports are that Kamala has flip flopped some what and is now mirroring some of trumps policies that she used to be against in an attempt to become more popular. Anyways, it appears that the normally red areas are still red and the normally blue areas are turning towards red so that indicates Trump is popular everywhere.
The sentence you keep quoting is an explanation as to why it is logical to conclude which candidate is the most popular and the candidate that the public would like to see in office. As hilltop explained, that doesn’t absolutely guarantee that the public will get the person they want as president.
I’ll use a Taylor Swift analogy also. If Taylor Swift and a local small town band were both playing in a nearby city which one would draw a bigger crowd? Could a person use the crowd size that each performer drew to logically conclude who the public thinks is a better performer? Which performer sings the songs the public wants to hear? Is crowd size not a type of “data”? I suspect if the topic wasn’t about Trump you would not have a problem using the same type of data to draw conclusions just like I did. I’m this case you want a different conclusion than the data shows.
Edited by havin’funfarming 9/4/2024 08:25
|
More of the same
