|
| 2 ft above the canopy simply ensures a VERY poor application. Your repeated comments demonstrate that you know nothing about effective aerial application other than the negative catch phrases repeated by those who base their conjecture on assumptions rather than physics.
Dilution is not the solution.
Poor efficacy of certain ground applications does not provide the basis for analysis of other methods of application. ALL applications have the potential to be done poorly. That does NOT mean that ALL applications are done poorly. | |
|
Aerial application of Liberty
