AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (90) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Inductor vs eductor for sprayer chems
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Machinery TalkMessage format
 
4WD
Posted 2/21/2024 15:27 (#10633741 - in reply to #10633727)
Subject: RE: Inductor vs eductor for sprayer chems


Between Omaha and Des Moines, 7 miles South of I80

tedbear - 2/21/2024 15:17 Your thinking agrees with mine. I always use an Inductor. As mentioned the pump "sucks" in the water and chemical from a cone tank that are both tee'd into the inlet of the pump. Each branch has a quarter turn valve so for adjustment. Once the chemical has been "sucked in", its valve is shut so that the pump does not suck air in through that path. An eductor must use a venturi to create a low pressure area within the plumbing so the chemical is sucked in after the pump. One argument against an inductor arrangement is that the chemical is going through the pump. This is true but I have not seen any damage from this in several years of use. The overwhelming quantity of water that is involved tends to flush the chemical through.

One thing about an eductor system is that if the operator should shut the hose off downstream since the tank got full and the transfer pump is still running that it can force water out the top of the cone tank. This is not real likely to happen but is a possibility.


Tedbear,
On your last paragraph, this has happen to me and shot/squirted chemical/water straight up in the air, out center of eductor, if lid was open AND lower tank valve was open, at that moment. Learned my lesson, make sure lower, bottom Cleanload valve is closed FIRST; before any downstream valve might be closed.

Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)