East of Broken Bow | havin’funfarming - 10/18/2023 08:38
Ok. So if we are going to be thinking rationally, following science, and being honest I have a few questions.
Were all trial participants included in the results?
Were these shots tested to the normal standards and were long term effects studied?
The trials indicated efficacy against covid only. Would it be true that when all of the negative effects, including mortalities other than covid, are added up that the net effect of getting the shot might be worse than not getting the shot? Especially long term? If that is even known.
Why was the medical community, that was so deathly afraid of covid, also so deathly afraid of anything that might have competed with the shots for keeping people out of the hospital?
It is a well known truth that proper nutrition, including vitamins and minerals, helps people stay healthy and fight off illnesses and stay out of the hospital. Why is it that only the medical experts who tend to get censored encourage this as at least an aid to combatting the virus?
Why was virtually every stated goal of the shot broken, except for the financial gain part?
The truth is there are a lot of very valid questions to be asked. Another question is why are we not supposed to ask the “experts” these questions?
At this point, trust but verify is a very legitimate method of inquiry. The only reason for censorship is to cover things up.
The original Pfizer test of the Covid vaccine had the number of Covid deaths down significantly, but when you added all causes of death excluding accidents, the group that had gotten the Covid shots had a higher overall death rate, I think due to cardiovascular issues. At the end of the trial period, everyone who had gotten the placebo, was given the actual Covid shot, so we do not know the long term differences. |
Latest Covid shot
