AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (31) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Ammonia tanker wreck
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> AgTalk CafeMessage format
 
boa628
Posted 10/1/2023 10:29 (#10423325 - in reply to #10423150)
Subject: RE: Ammonia tanker wreck


SWOH
Ron..NE ILL..10/48 - 10/1/2023 07:41

I'm sure the 28% users here realize their product starts as 32% UAN that someone adds a specified amount of water to make a more diluted solution. The only advantage is that it overwinters better and 28% won't salt out like 32%.

But, 28% only has 560# of N per ton of material, 32% has 640# of N per ton. NH3 has 1640# of N per ton. I am guessing we will be using as many tons of actual N as always, so transportation will have figure out how to transport THREE times the volume of product as they are today. If you're considering getting in the seasonal liquid tanker business, this might be a good time!

I agree that NH3, just like guns or planes or autos is a completely safe product when handled correctly. But any of those items can kill you, though I'm sure the auto is the main culprit. Squishing a Tesla with an 80,000# tanker isn't completely out of the question. I also state that we've used NH3 on our farm and it's heavily utilized in NE IL & I don't personally know of anyone killed by it. I only know of a couple of burn victims from NH3. I also had a classmate in HS that became a victim (while still in HS) of the infamous IH "pressurized gas tank" situation on his picker tractor when he gassed it. He was heavily scarred for life. There's always problems.




We’ve never used NH3 at our place but I’ve dealt with it before at a previous job. Took a little bit of a inhalation shot of it once that took the wind out of me briefly but nothing ever serious. Doc said I have scarring on one lung and I assume it’s from that incident but not 100% sure. There used to be quite a bit of it used in our area and some still do but it’s harder to get it here. All the local places got rid of their tanks so now there’s a LOT more road time with tanks if you want to use it. It’s really not worth the hassle of getting it for us.

If they outlaw the stuff or regulate it out of practical use, there will be more 28% and 32% sitting around in tanks. And on the road. So logically there will be more tank fails and accidents involving those tankers on the road which will likely cause environmental issues that will need to be addressed with more regulation until it’s regulated to the point of not being usable…and then what? I don’t use the stuff but I agree with you Ron, it’s not very often we hear of NH3 accidents and the guys that want to use it I hope still get to use it. Just a terrible situation in Illinois.
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)