AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (56) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Question for emergency responders
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> AgTalk CafeMessage format
 
johndeere1
Posted 9/30/2023 19:51 (#10422768 - in reply to #10422513)
Subject: RE: Question for emergency responders


Central Saskatchewan Canada
WYDave - 9/30/2023 14:29

The answer is "it depends."

Anhydrous presents several different hazards to manage. The first hazard, of course, is what we categorize as "IDLH" (Immediate Danger to Life and Health) from higher (> 35 ppm for > 15 minutes, or 300 ppm in a short time frame) concentrations of the gas.  

The second immediate hazard is possible explosion or deflagration - people often forget (due to the more immediate danger above) that ammonia is flammable in air, and when the concentration gets high enough, it can explode or deflagrate in the right concentrations.

Lastly, there is the issue of contamination in runoff water. A gallon of water can absorb between a pound and two pounds of anhydrous, depending on how well you can disperse the ammonia into the water.

Then there is a problem for firefighters in close enough proximity to the anhydrous escape in applying water to an anhydrous escape is that while our SCBA systems provide protection against anhydrous, bunker gear does not.  

So, long story short: The issue of dousing with water depends on the presentation and which danger(s) the firefighters are trying to mitigate.



A gallon of water can absorb a lot more than a pound of nh3. Probly about 1000 time.
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)