AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

New deere quad (pic)
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Machinery TalkMessage format
 
azcutter
Posted 5/11/2014 19:45 (#3864399)
Subject: New deere quad (pic)


Casa Grande,AZ		New john deere quad track

Edited by azcutter 5/11/2014 20:39




(image.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments image.jpg (96KB - 1689 downloads)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Chad H
Posted 5/11/2014 19:56 (#3864433 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


NE SD		Needs a little more yellow behind the cab but I would sure run one.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
six feet aboveground
Posted 5/11/2014 20:03 (#3864449 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


Hear it has Cummins engine.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
WillB
Posted 5/11/2014 20:12 (#3864474 - in reply to #3864449)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


Ontario Canada
six feet aboveground - 5/11/2014 20:03

Hear it has Cummins engine.


I bet not, chances are it is a powertech. Would not have the 55 gallon drum exhsust if it were Cummins powered.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
canadian farmer
Posted 5/11/2014 20:14 (#3864484 - in reply to #3864474)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


My bet is a QSX15.  The engine / filters / cooling arrangement on all the pictures I have seen appears different than the 13.5

From The Combine Forum:

This tractor will be a 9RX. The X representing 4 track design. The largest size will be a 9650RX with a 15L cummins engine. Deere and Cummins teamed up in designing a special "deere only" cummins engine with a deere serial number. (this will get around dealers needing certifications.)
 



Edited by canadian farmer 5/11/2014 20:25
Top of the page Bottom of the page
tj_farmer
Posted 5/12/2014 06:23 (#3865132 - in reply to #3864484)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


NW central IL		interesting they actually teamed up, I heard the cummins was put in as a test mule until their larger motor was finished with testing
Top of the page Bottom of the page
KelB
Posted 5/12/2014 06:45 (#3865170 - in reply to #3865132)
Subject: RE: New deere quad



Ayr Queensland Australia 4807		I heard they have allot of Cummins shares
Top of the page Bottom of the page
johnypop
Posted 5/11/2014 20:12 (#3864475 - in reply to #3864449)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


ND		Why would Deere go back to Cummins?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Chad H
Posted 5/11/2014 20:13 (#3864480 - in reply to #3864475)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


NE SD		They use Cummins in forage harvesters, not sure why they wouldn't in higher hp tractors. Looks to me like it says 9610 on the side.

Edited by Chad H 5/11/2014 20:14
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Gerard
Posted 5/11/2014 20:15 (#3864487 - in reply to #3864475)
Subject: RE: New deere quad



Woodham, Ontario		They still are using Cummins engines in the 7980 forage harvesters... Those are still Tier 2 motors (800hp)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
garvo
Posted 5/11/2014 20:23 (#3864508 - in reply to #3864487)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


western iowa,by Denison		till you run the chopper with the cummins you will not understand horsepower-after running my 7950 with the q-19 I can truly say all other motors have NO power
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Trucker1
Posted 5/11/2014 21:24 (#3864713 - in reply to #3864508)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


Sparta, WI

garvo - 5/11/2014 20:23 till you run the chopper with the cummins you will not understand horsepower-after running my 7950 with the q-19 I can truly say all other motors have NO power



The Cummins is a beast but also a massive fuel hog. If you think no other motor has power you have never ran one of these. :)


  



Edited by Trucker1 5/11/2014 21:24
Top of the page Bottom of the page
S.C.B. Farms
Posted 5/11/2014 20:06 (#3864458 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


Southeast Iowa		What model or size is that one ?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Newguy
Posted 5/11/2014 20:11 (#3864472 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere delta track.....


Renville Minnesota		IMO
Top of the page Bottom of the page
RedFork2.0
Posted 5/11/2014 20:38 (#3864555 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


Central Oklahoma

Yikes that's ugly!  

This looks much better, but of course it isn't Deere's tracks.

4TracDeere560

I really just don't like the looks of any new tractors, IMO.

 

Top of the page Bottom of the page
swcil
Posted 5/11/2014 20:48 (#3864581 - in reply to #3864555)
Subject: RE: New deere quad



Macoupin County IL		Nice looking Deere might get a few of the quad people back
You know what they say once you go red you never go back
Maybe that wasn't what they say but sounded good : )
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Galen
Posted 5/11/2014 21:17 (#3864679 - in reply to #3864581)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


NE, KS
swcil - 5/11/2014
You know what they say once you go red you never


I cannot agree with that statement !
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Franz
Posted 5/11/2014 20:57 (#3864610 - in reply to #3864555)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


Ohio		Those ATI tracks with the extra idler are fugly.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Old Pokey
Posted 5/11/2014 21:01 (#3864627 - in reply to #3864610)
Subject: Boy, you sure are a busy guy.


Franz - 5/11/2014 17:57 Those ATI tracks with the extra idler are fugly.

 40+ posts in less than a day.

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Franz
Posted 5/11/2014 21:09 (#3864651 - in reply to #3864627)
Subject: RE: Boy, you sure are a busy guy.


Ohio		I think you need to refigure your calculations.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
TA63
Posted 5/11/2014 21:36 (#3864753 - in reply to #3864610)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


SD
Franz - 5/11/2014 20:57

Those ATI tracks with the extra idler are fugly.


They look a million times better than the tracks on the original pic, and case quads.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Mntaxedtodeath
Posted 5/11/2014 21:56 (#3864818 - in reply to #3864753)
Subject: RE: New deere quad



SWMN
TA63 - 5/11/2014 21:36

Franz - 5/11/2014 20:57

Those ATI tracks with the extra idler are fugly.


They look a million times better than the tracks on the original pic, and case quads.

They have the same solid idler wheels that the first case quads Had and didn't work . I guess they will have to take many years to figure them out to get them as good as case are now.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
TA63
Posted 5/11/2014 22:23 (#3864893 - in reply to #3864818)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


SD
Mntaxedtodeath - 5/11/2014 21:56

TA63 - 5/11/2014 21:36

Franz - 5/11/2014 20:57

Those ATI tracks with the extra idler are fugly.


They look a million times better than the tracks on the original pic, and case quads.

They have the same solid idler wheels that the first case quads Had and didn't work . I guess they will have to take many years to figure them out to get them as good as case are now.


Not gonna pretend to know much about them, as I have very little time in a quad of any manufacture. I just find the ATI version to be more aesthetically pleasing, and it would seem the design would lend itself to climbing up and over ruts, etc better than the flat bottoms on Case track undercarriages.

Edited by TA63 5/11/2014 22:23
Top of the page Bottom of the page
case1h
Posted 5/13/2014 18:16 (#3868466 - in reply to #3864818)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


There basically the same as the new holland version of the quadtrac
Top of the page Bottom of the page
illinois-kris
Posted 5/11/2014 23:58 (#3865016 - in reply to #3864753)
Subject: RE: New deere quad


IL		What's all this talk about how it looks? Wait I'm on a post with the wrong colored equipment. Deere people worry about looks, the rest worry about performance.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
730diesel
Posted 5/11/2014 20:52 (#3864593 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


NE ND		Imagine the price tag.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
jedeka
Posted 5/11/2014 22:22 (#3864889 - in reply to #3864593)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


Boone, Iowa		Just put it on your Farm Plan account. Lol.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Erik in SD
Posted 5/11/2014 20:54 (#3864596 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


East Central SD		I'll never have a need for it, but it sure would be fun to run!
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Farmboy170
Posted 5/11/2014 20:59 (#3864621 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


NJ		I see they put a flapper on the exhaust instead of the stupid curved stack that every time it rains it gets water down the exhaust. Then when you start it it blows sooty water all over everything.... I hate curved stacks
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ontario
Posted 5/11/2014 21:02 (#3864630 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


Wow ugly, why do these engineers design tractors to look like transformers?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
TSBFarms
Posted 5/11/2014 21:05 (#3864638 - in reply to #3864630)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


NC Iowa

+1

Top of the page Bottom of the page
cdm975
Posted 5/11/2014 21:07 (#3864647 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


Manitoba, Canada		That looks like the camoplast undercarriage.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
iamurphy
Posted 5/11/2014 21:21 (#3864698 - in reply to #3864647)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)



NE,IOWA		13.5 deere motor 15 liter cummins
Top of the page Bottom of the page
WTW
Posted 5/11/2014 23:27 (#3864994 - in reply to #3864647)
Subject: +1 on the Camoplast undercarriage


Winkler, Manitoba Canada		I would agree that the track design has remarkable similarities to the Delta Track Versatile which runs on a Camoplast undercarriage. However, after looking at the picture I wonder if it is actually a photo or a photoshop production. The front drive axle on the picture appears to be located so as to place the differential in the space the engine would occupy.

Edited by WTW 5/11/2014 23:29
Top of the page Bottom of the page
tperhus
Posted 5/12/2014 09:00 (#3865427 - in reply to #3864647)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


SE ND		that's because it is a camoplast undercarriage. even the RT tractors are camoplast undercarriage.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
tractorpaint
Posted 5/11/2014 21:54 (#3864813 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


NW iowa		Was this a snapchat? Looks like it because of the number in the corner.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
farmer_white
Posted 5/11/2014 22:21 (#3864886 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


SC WI		It's strange that all the deere guys said they didn't need a quad and that 2 tracks were better. Give it a few years and deere won't even make a 2 track unit anymore.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
olwhda
Posted 5/11/2014 22:36 (#3864925 - in reply to #3864886)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


Liberty, MO		Got my belly full of JD Tracks berming on the ends when they applied my NH3, almost like jumping combine ruts, 30 inch or bigger tracks, not going to happen next year, I'll get my old 3pt mtd bar out replace all the hoses, and put it on 9 knives, 21ft at a time. with 1,000 gal wagons, not the 2,000 gal kind.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
bpreuss
Posted 5/11/2014 23:12 (#3864982 - in reply to #3864886)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


MN		If Deere would ever stop making the 2 track units, which they won't, I would have to buy CAT. No desire for any articulated tractor on this farm
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Cougar
Posted 5/12/2014 18:21 (#3866290 - in reply to #3864982)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


S. IL		Have you ever ran a quadtrac alongside a 2 track unit?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
bpreuss
Posted 5/14/2014 09:03 (#3869559 - in reply to #3866290)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


MN		our good friend/neighbor that we harvest sugar beets with has had quad tracks since day 1, so I have been in/around them for a long time. I myself do not like articulated tractors anyway, but after seeing all of the problems he has with every single unit, and the amount of fuel those things burn, I will never own one.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
White Workhorse
Posted 5/11/2014 23:10 (#3864977 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


Sourthern WI		I love how the sheet metal follows the profile of the track. What a cobble job. Looks like they were too cheap to bother coming up with sheet metal for both the wheel version and the track version.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Glenn W.
Posted 5/12/2014 00:02 (#3865018 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


Southeast Washington		In our area we welcome any large horsepower tracked tractor and the more the competition the better off we are with more options. For the hills in the PNW they just can't get tires to hook up like the tracks can. I know JD came out with big duals and triples Michelins saying they could pull like a quad track but never could get it to hook up in the hills like the tracked tractors.

Thanks JD for another option for us and we don't even have a John Deere tractor on our farm at this point in time although we have had MFWD's in the past.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
CentralILFarmer
Posted 5/12/2014 12:21 (#3865764 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


ECIL

Read on another forum that yes it is a Cummins 15L but supposedly it will be a "Deere Only" cummins motor with a deere serial #, and that the largest model will be a 9650RX, and it does look to me like that model is a 96?? RX. But then again maybe its fake. Who knows.

I guess CanadianFarmer already posted that. Oops.  



Edited by CentralILFarmer 5/12/2014 12:27
Top of the page Bottom of the page
CentralILFarmer
Posted 5/12/2014 12:23 (#3865771 - in reply to #3865764)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


ECIL

Here is another picture :

 

Top of the page Bottom of the page
kritzy
Posted 5/12/2014 15:30 (#3866033 - in reply to #3865771)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


red river valley se of fargo		In reply to trucker1, I don't think we'll see too many v-8's in tractors anymore.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Trucker1
Posted 5/12/2014 18:04 (#3866250 - in reply to #3866033)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


Sparta, WI		Garvo and I were referring to SPFH engines.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
case1h
Posted 5/13/2014 18:23 (#3868473 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


I'm sure Deere will tell everyone they invented the concept of the quadtrac. Their 2 track design is a dud compared to the quad. No comparison
Top of the page Bottom of the page
n_gus347
Posted 9/30/2014 09:35 (#4100875 - in reply to #3864399)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)


The 9610 RX is essentially a Versatile Delta Track painted green. Has a Cummins QSX15 engine, Caterpillar transmission, and the track units are all Camoplast.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
countryraised
Posted 9/30/2014 09:58 (#4100898 - in reply to #4100875)
Subject: RE: New deere quad (pic)



NE Iowa		and where do you come up with this wealth of misinformation?
not everything you say is wrong but not everything is correct either. and on a 4 month old post...
camoplast has always made deere's tracks, but they are not the same carriage.
no cat transmission, same transmission as other deere 4wd. yes, cummins 15L.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)