That's a replacement tach, and I'll bet that the hourmeter doesn't work in it.

Why do the late model ones sound so pathetic, anyway?  Our 4010 sounds stout.  The 4000 sounds sissified. 

I agree on tach. To me the tractor looks a little rough for those hours on the tach. We have a '72 that is cleaner, but more hours.

Alan, if you follow this sale, could you report back?

Thanks

I thought all the SR console tractors had the long shifter?

We'll know Saturday..... but I'm going to guess $15,500 should get it to the Bradley house hold.....with the loader attached

Do weights add that much to price? Front slabs (double-stack) & 145 wheel weights?

I believe a 16.9x38 would be a common tire size for the late models, right? Supposedly hard to get 16.9s?

There was some complaints years ago about replacement tachs for 4020's coming from Mexico.

My 2010 also has the crooked shift lever as shown. Also has different shifting pattern.

1-2-R in first range 3-4-R in second range 5-6-R in third range 7-8 in 4th range

2010 with long shifter?   I didn't know they did that.

I would say closer to 20k than to 10k.  If hours were original it would break the 20,000.

Lol ding...they've made up their mind.  They want to sell it whichever way it brings the most!  :)

That's how a tractor and loader is almost always sold.  A combine and head used to sell that way a lot of times. 

I guess I don't really see the big problem.  Assuming you want the combination, all you have to do is wait and bid once and it's probably yours. 

I think it has been repainted at one time ,  and the decal no's are individual decals, factoy  decal was one piece except for diesel decal..

also, both rock shaft cowlings are not correct...

11,000 - 11,500$ w/loader

Too bad Plowboy, you should have said $18,749.  You've already lost and they haven't bid yet!  Lol...

I agree it'll bring too much but good looking 4020's do!  That loader is nice (from here it is anyway!)

We've found that triple hydraulics on late model 4020's is not all that uncommon.  We thought it was maybe rare but it seems that since they were available that way, several guys took avantage of that option.  Still neat to have if you ask me.

It'll sell for less than $17,750 so I'll say $17499.  Ha!

I do not understand what your saying on bids.

he'd probaly pay more if it had a Mechanical leveling loader........

Never understand why people will pay 12-15 grand for a worn out  tractor. That thing has been around and seen its better days. a worn out clutch petal, a cheap paint job and questionable hours. It would look even worse if you got up close to it. 

 I would look for a good 4230 for the same money. One  hell of a lot better unit for the same money. I have owned both of them and ther is no comparison in the difference.

You maka no sense.  You say dat de weight distribution is wrong witha da cab, den you say that ita too heaby on de front axle.  I don't know how de putta together de tractors downa dere, but uppa here, we putta de cab on de back end. 

I doo not understand why you tinka de front end ofa de 4240 is heavier den de 4430?  Dey look just alika to me. 

I'd have to go drive on the scales...well, and put the 4430 back together first....but I don't really think the 4020 was much lighter on the front then the 30s were. 

Every loader I've ever seen was in front of the front axle.    They are kinda hard to use if they aren't.