![](/images/spacer.gif) | |
![](/profile/get-photo.asp?memberid=536&type=profile&rnd=654)
| I haven't read the other replies but I would recommend the perm-a-columns. I put up a new tool shed / shop in 1979, laminated columns of a 2x8 with 2x6s on each side. In 2010 our dog was digging around one of the columns, I noticed that the 2x6s were completely rotted off & only about 1/2 of the 2x8 was left. This was approx 4-6" below ground. Started digging around & found all the other columns were in similar condition. I hired a contractor to jack up the building, dig out the wood columns && replace the bottoms with perm-a=-columns. I know of two other buildings in our area that was built in the same time period. One the owner did as we did. The other tore his down, columns were totally rotted off under ground, & built a new building, though not sure if he used perm-a-columns. FFWI, we are in an are with a high water table. When the contractor did mine it was in December & he was surprised to get water in the holes at 3'. I feel they added at least another 25 - 30 years of life to my building
Since then we have built two buildings, a 80x120 shop & a 72x 120 cold storage building. Went with perm-a-columns on both buildings. On the last one, the 72 x120, the contractor dug holes about 2x the size of the perm-a-column, set the perm-a-column & poured cement around the column. When I questioned him about why using the concrete he claimed that he had found when using just the perm-a-column that over a period of time wind against the building would eventually work the columns loose & that the concrete prevented this. I have no proof that this is correct but the guy has been in the business a lot of years & put up a lot of buildings. | |
|