![]() | ||
AgTalk Home | ||
| ||
![]() Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page] | View previous thread :: View next thread |
Forums List -> Precision Talk | Message format |
gwagner![]() |
| ||
This past spring we purchased a 2016 John Deere R Tractor with a 4600 display. We opted to install the full data record keeping software into the 4600. First of all the 4600 display in my opinion is not ready for “big” time yet. Navigation and screen layouts are not very user friendly. Maybe other farmers have opinions that I would like to hear. My comments are focused on the data collected. At the time we started recording the “as applied” data I didn’t realize that the data collected could not be loaded into Apex. All data MUST be loaded into the John Deere Operations Center. I was told by 1-800-GreenStar, rep, that Apex will not read 4600 data. It is a completely different data file format and Apex will not be updated to read this file structure. I am not a big fan of loading farm data unto a server unless I WANT TO, not being forced to. As we go forward, the new John Deere sprayers, combines, and planters will all operate with the 4600 (4640) display. It looks like if you are a Deere customer and want to purchase the newer technology they offer they are going to get our data if we like it or not. So much for being a "open data" company Now some will say; “In the operation center, you can opt out sharing data”, this is true, but they put strict limitations on the data analysis you can view. Guess I didn't read the fine print before I purchased the new tractor and "MOTHER" deere knows better than I do. Nothing like being between a rock and hard place. Any thoughts? Gary Edited by gwagner 6/19/2017 22:43 | |||
| |||
cyclones30![]() |
| ||
![]() Midwest | You're correct on Apex not reading the new data. I would venture to guess SMS and others will eventually be able to deal with the data. It always takes a little time after release for the 3rd party programs to catch up. | ||
| |||
Rossf93![]() |
| ||
just my 2 cents i would beg to differ on the navigational use of the new screen, very easy to use and can all be operated from a single screen, job, map, farm, field, client, swap track, machine width, work setup, this is just the usual thing of resistance to change, initially i felt exactly the same way but after some use i have found to the screen to be very much the opposite and it poses much more processing power for future use, yes the apex thing could be somewhat of an issue but apex is a prehistoric system and has nothing but complaints for ease of use. listening to the comments about SMS etc i agree that a simple single userface would be more useful but at the end of the day John Deere is a business much like apple etc, you will not see apple and microsoft working together to gain business for both parties, although probably not a huge advantage to most, the operations center already allows compatibility with Ag Leader Versa™, Integra™, and Compass™ displays so in time id expect more usability. the big picture with the operations center is for a easier more connected solution, allowing agronomists, dealers, anyone who can aid your business access to the data without having to get it hardwired via usb. this works both ways with you being able to send jobs instantaneously through this one system not having to bounce betwen, jdlink, ape and MJD...it is trying to transition to a much smoother workflow, the 4600 & 4640 both upload information to the cloud in real time allowing for managers and farmers to see the job as its happening. if this isn't for you, you can freely turn syncing off and upload the data via the trusty old USB via the upload manager program available on the site whenever you desire, keep as many files as you want and only upload which you'd prefer or require. what functionality do you use currently that you would like to see in either the 4600 or MJD operations center? | |||
| |||
GOOSEPILOT![]() |
| ||
WC Mn/Dakotas | ... | ||
| |||
McFlyAg![]() |
| ||
Ross93, | |||
| |||
torn![]() |
| ||
roaming | gwagner - 6/19/2017 21:32 Now some will say; “In the operation center, you can opt out sharing data”, this is true, but they put strict limitations on the data analysis you can view. Guess I didn't read the fine print before I purchased the new tractor and "MOTHER" deere knows better than I do. I'm not disagreeing with anything you said, but let me play the Devil's advocate: If you HAD read the fine print, would it have made a difference in your purchase decision? Or are you just saying that you wish there had been full disclosure up front, even though you would have made the same decision? | ||
| |||
gwagner![]() |
| ||
You are right; I probably would have made the same decision on purchasing the tractor. BUT I had the option to use a 2630 to record my “as applied” data and not unlock the “as applied” codes in the 4600. When my dealer didn’t realize that 4600 data could not be read by Apex, until I told him yesterday, something is not right. Once the codes are entered in the 4600, I am told they cannot be transferred. The reason I posted this thread is to let other farmer know what will happen if you purchase a 4600, I went into it blind. | |||
| |||
4wdaaron![]() |
| ||
Northern Indiana | Four calendar years the Gen 4 has been on the armrest of 8R tractors and they still don't have it figured out. For every one one good thing there's about five bad things. Doing some particular things take 30-150% more button presses than before. Sure wish we could put 2630 software on the Gen 4 hardware Edited by 4wdaaron 6/20/2017 10:46 | ||
| |||
gwagner![]() |
| ||
I agree the 4600 display has a lot to offer. Here is what I do not like about the display;
So far MJD is much like Apex (and I agree Apex needs to go away), doesn’t allow editing of application entries. I made a mistake and entered 6 floz on a herbicide application, that I applied 4 floz. This can be serious when it is on someone else’s server, especially if it was off label. The next post is what I like | |||
| |||
rollig![]() |
| ||
SCMN | You guys are making me feel better about buying new 2630's this spring instead of waiting for a 4640 universal option. | ||
| |||
earp![]() |
| ||
Manila, Ar | JD keeps trying to make this too complicated..........most of the functions have very little value to me, and I'm only running armrest monitors and 2630 screens.......I still like the old brown box, it was simple and didn't offer a lot variations, and it was and still is all i needed......:) | ||
| |||
Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page] |
Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |
(Delete cookies) | |