AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (3) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page]
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Machinery TalkMessage format
 
sonic
Posted 3/6/2015 08:29 (#4435212)
Subject: IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2


the the main difference beside a few hp is the 6799 doesnt have a ta, which makes it slower on the road.  

Top of the page Bottom of the page
jalopy
Posted 3/6/2015 08:46 (#4435249 - in reply to #4435212)
Subject: RE: IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2


NC IA
All had TAs, unless someone has eliminated it. The 37s and 67s had the 3 speed with high-low range, and the 33-35-63-65 had 4-speed. The 37 & 67 had odd-ball ratio ring & pinions, that what makes them slower in high gear. Also VERY expensive if not impossible to find a ring & pinion for a 37/67. Smaller ones had same ring & pinion as all the common 1486 & smaller 2wds. None had planetary rear-ends, all had bull gear rears like 1086's. In fact I think they all used 3-1/4 inch axles like 9xx's, which to this day baffels me.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
jkuu72
Posted 3/6/2015 09:05 (#4435299 - in reply to #4435249)
Subject: RE: IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2


most people would rather stay away from both models
Top of the page Bottom of the page
sonic
Posted 3/6/2015 09:20 (#4435331 - in reply to #4435299)
Subject: RE: IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2


do you suggest the 35 and 37 models?  cant beat the floation of the 2+2s

Top of the page Bottom of the page
jalopy
Posted 3/6/2015 09:28 (#4435352 - in reply to #4435331)
Subject: RE: IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2


NC IA
sonic - 3/6/2015 08:20

do you suggest the 35 and 37 models?  cant beat the floation of the 2+2s



I would say that any of them that has lived long enough to be in operation today surely can't be too bad. The weak ones have long ago became organ donors in a boneyard.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
frmerndel
Posted 3/6/2015 09:52 (#4435432 - in reply to #4435212)
Subject: RE: IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2


Think you would be much much better off with a 7100 series boxcar fwa magnum. Prob going to pay a little more..... But the headache potential of the 6588 or 6788 wouldn't be worth it for me, not to mention value down the road.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
jkuu72
Posted 3/6/2015 09:59 (#4435443 - in reply to #4435352)
Subject: RE: IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2


yes
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Pete1468
Posted 3/6/2015 10:07 (#4435459 - in reply to #4435212)
Subject: RE: IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2


Norhtwest Iowa
Dad had a 6788 that we used on a planter and a disk every once and a while. It would go places my 7250 wouldn't dare. I liked it for planting and loved it on my box scraper. It would go around 20 mph down the road.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Detroit
Posted 3/6/2015 10:56 (#4435552 - in reply to #4435432)
Subject: RE: IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2


Crawfordsville, Arkansas
frmerndel - 3/6/2015 08:52

Think you would be much much better off with a 7100 series boxcar fwa magnum. Prob going to pay a little more..... But the headache potential of the 6588 or 6788 wouldn't be worth it for me, not to mention value down the road.


I'd go further and say pretty much anything would beat a 2+2.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Vigarfarms
Posted 3/6/2015 12:05 (#4435702 - in reply to #4435459)
Subject: RE: IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2


rochester IN
We had both and would strongly suggest the 6ooo series over the 35 if for no other reason the power steering is much better. I would never buy a 35 again the 67 was tolerable but takes some getting use to.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
5288
Posted 3/6/2015 12:17 (#4435735 - in reply to #4435702)
Subject: RE: IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2


S.E. South Dakota
Like anything that age you could get a good one or a money pit.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
boog
Posted 3/6/2015 16:36 (#4436211 - in reply to #4435432)
Subject: Ditto



I demoed two 3588s back in the day, actually only demoed one because the first one never made it to the field. They're a tractor people either love or hate, I was in the 2nd group. Good friend bought a new 3588, traded it after 1 yr for a 3788 & IIRC, traded taht before the year was up for a 5488 He told me that the he regretted buying either of the 2+ 2s.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
sj3788
Posted 3/6/2015 18:03 (#4436371 - in reply to #4435212)
Subject: RE: IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2


swohio
So far my 3788 has treated me well. One great graincart tractor.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jon Hagen
Posted 3/6/2015 18:39 (#4436446 - in reply to #4435212)
Subject: RE: IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2



Hagen Brothers farms,Goodrich ND
sonic - 3/7/2015 07:29

the the main difference beside a few hp is the 6799 doesnt have a ta, which makes it slower on the road.  








Not so, a TA gives you a lower gear in low range, high range in a TA is the same as that gear in a tractor without TA, so road speed is the same.

The 35 has a 4 spd trans X 2 ranges, = 8 spd. The 37 /67 has a 3 spd trans X two ranges= 6 spd.


With the same size wheels front and rear,+ that engine weight hanging way out in front of the axle, 2+2 has far more traction than a similar weight FWA tractor.

Edited by Jon Hagen 3/6/2015 18:42
Top of the page Bottom of the page
jalopy
Posted 3/7/2015 12:32 (#4437959 - in reply to #4436446)
Subject: RE: IH 6588 vs 6788 2+2


NC IA
The difference in road speed between x588 vs x788 is difference in ring & pinion ratio in the rear end.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)