AgTalk Home | ||
| ||
Case Farmall 95 - good/bad? Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page] | View previous thread :: View next thread |
Forums List -> Machinery Talk | Message format |
Mitchell |
| ||
Mitchell, SD | My local case dealer has a used 95 Farmall for sale with loader and cab. Looks clean with decent tires How are they on reliability? only has 3200 hrs. Wants $35K | ||
scott nelsen |
| ||
Leeds, North Dakota | http://www.tractordata.com/farm-tractors/006/3/1/6312-caseih-farmal... price seems steep, Scott. | ||
Dennis SEND |
| ||
Dad has a Farmall 95U which is "top of the line" model in that series for Case IH is it a nice tractor, had a JX 65 prior to this one and the 95U is 100 times the tractor. Dad's tractor is an 11' model and was built in Italy it is much more refined than a Turkish built tractor, cab is much quieter and overall better built, I never grew up around year-a-round cabs but they couldn't been much worse, that JX 65 Dad had was so noisy in the cab it was impossible to use a cell phone while driving and also road speeds were slow as it only went 15 mph. The Farmall 95U he has now is quiet and I like everything except I wish it was a powershift in gears 1-4, it does shift smoothly but a powershift would be nice, it also goes 29 MPH down the road so be use it a lot going after stuff like picking up rocks and moving stuff around at different farms with the pallet forks. Edited by Dennis SEND 12/10/2013 14:24 | |||
Canderson012 |
| ||
Houston County, GA | I have a 105u, no loader. Good tractor to me. I think dealer should come down a few due to the high hours. Go for it | ||
40DODGE |
| ||
W. Kansas | With loader price seems inline to me. We've sold quite a few and they have been good tractors. If it has the power shuttle it has the wet clutch and is very reliable. | ||
ricksitzmann |
| ||
Iowa | You can find one with less hours for same money | ||
fumbles |
| ||
SEMN | Have one with almost 500hrs, no problems yet. Don't like the shift levers, they are too close to my right leg especially when using the foot throttle. Cab not very quiet, stereo is a POS. Need a tool to check the hydraulic fluid. Steering radius not very good when set on 30" rows. If the old John Deere 2550 had a cab on it I would take it before the 95. | ||
midmomike |
| ||
audrain county missouri | Our has 600 hrs on it and it has been to the shop 5 times already. Talked to dealer and said sorry cant help you because it is out of warrenty. Also be prepared when you need a battery....$320 for battery because only one company makes them. I also think the hydraulics are weak. My brother has a JD about the same size and it seems to be a lot better tractor. JMO | ||
CRJ |
| ||
NEIN | I too am looking at one of these tractors but the new 95C model. Has a better cab, seat and better location of the controls. More Americanized I guess you could say. Look on tractor house for used ones though, there is one in Wisconsin with low hours and the loader for 35$k. Check the options - there is a higher capacity pump option and wheel weights for the rear, ect.There are lots of them for sale but I wouldnt pay anywhere near that much for one with 3000 hours. | ||
eth555 |
| ||
SE MN | The 95 and 95C are two different tractors. The 95 is made by Turk Tractor in Turkey, the 95C is made by CNH in Italy. The 95C should be a much nicer tractor; and the cab is newly designed, but probably more $. | ||
Mitchell |
| ||
Mitchell, SD | thanks for all the info ! | ||
CRJ |
| ||
NEIN | In the past I believe you are correct about the c's, they were a different tractor, but the new 95c's are just an improved version of the Turkish model. At least thats what I m being told. | ||
Jump to page : 1 Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page] |
Search this forum Printer friendly version E-mail a link to this thread |
(Delete cookies) | |