AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (115) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Disk-vs-field cultivator
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page]
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Crop TalkMessage format
 
wstickel
Posted 5/24/2013 19:23 (#3115673)
Subject: Disk-vs-field cultivator


In this area its about 50/50 for fitting ground. I know everybody says disks are big compaction makers but so are cultivators. I have heard the old they use disks to build roads etc, but just havent seen this on our farm, using penetrometer there is no more compaction in the fields we use disk on versus the fields we use field cultivator on? some of our ground is stony and cultivator brings up more rocks than disk does. Can cover more ground faster with cultivator for sure. looking at revamping our tillage tools so lets hear some valid fact based arguments for one over the other.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
senorthdakota
Posted 5/24/2013 19:30 (#3115683 - in reply to #3115673)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator


Get the best of both an get a soil finisher...
Top of the page Bottom of the page
wstickel
Posted 5/24/2013 19:40 (#3115705 - in reply to #3115683)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator


senorthdakota - 5/24/2013 19:30

Get the best of both an get a soil finisher...


Had one, couldnt keep it from plugging and couldnt keep it together
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ayrporte
Posted 5/24/2013 19:42 (#3115708 - in reply to #3115673)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator


Eastern Ont
If you have lots of stones get a disk
If you like picking stones get a cultivator
If you dont like either get a cultivator and a HEAVY packer
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Gerald J.
Posted 5/24/2013 19:56 (#3115727 - in reply to #3115673)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator



Disks I found excellent at deflating fluffy moldboard plowed ground. That looked like packing. Disks had no effect on grasses but if pulled 9 mph some weeds would be tossed into the air to land root exposed and to dry.

Field cultivator with the right sharp edged shovels were effective at cutting off spring weeds like grass and wild mustard the the disk left behind. Before I went notill, I plowed in the spring disked three times until I added a couple spring tooth bars to the disk, then I disked twice, and after either disking I made one pass with the field cultivator with three spring tooth bars on the back and I had a beautiful looking seed bed.

The disk was much better at leveling plow furrows than the FC.

Gerald J.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
wstickel
Posted 5/24/2013 20:00 (#3115734 - in reply to #3115727)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator


We pull a rolling harrow behind both tools and both make good seedbed. Think cultivator seed bed is more level however
Top of the page Bottom of the page
TMX864
Posted 5/24/2013 20:21 (#3115774 - in reply to #3115673)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator


Michigan
Cultivator is more fool proof. Even if the operator doesn't have it leveled correctly its not going to ridge like a disk. On our soils you will notice the compaction from a disk if the soil is to wet, a culivator will open the soil out to dry and leave a garden. However when the soil starts getting really dry a disk will leave the ground alot nicer than the culivator.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
rank
Posted 5/24/2013 20:29 (#3115790 - in reply to #3115727)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator


SEON
Gerald J. - 5/24/2013 19:56
Before I went notill, I plowed.... ... then I disked twice, and after either disking I made one pass with the field cultivator with three spring tooth bars on the back and I had a beautiful looking seed bed.

So it went like this?

1. Spring Plow
2. disk
3. FC
4. disk
5. FC
Top of the page Bottom of the page
wstickel
Posted 5/24/2013 20:36 (#3115803 - in reply to #3115673)
Subject: RE: Disk-vs-field cultivator


Anybody ever done a study to show yield differences between the different machines? Just seems always here things like "best disk is one parked in fence row" "havent used a disk in 20 years" or "they use disks to build roads" etc but never been shown factual information on this subject
Top of the page Bottom of the page
rank
Posted 5/24/2013 20:37 (#3115808 - in reply to #3115673)
Subject: RE: Disk-vs-field cultivator


SEON
wstickel - 5/24/2013 19:23
..... lets hear some valid fact based arguments for one over the other.

Time and money spent maintaining a disk are higher.....WAY higher if you have rocks.

Edited by rank 5/24/2013 21:59
Top of the page Bottom of the page
wstickel
Posted 5/24/2013 20:39 (#3115813 - in reply to #3115808)
Subject: RE: Disk-vs-field cultivator


rank - 5/24/2013 20:37

wstickel - 5/24/2013 19:23
..... lets hear some valid fact based arguments for one over the other.

Time and money spent maintaining a disk are higher.....WAY higher if you have rocks.


But how does it compare to time and money spent picking stone?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Maple Leaf
Posted 5/24/2013 21:16 (#3115911 - in reply to #3115803)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator


We used to cultivate and then disc while applying herbicide at same time. I found that the ground worked with disc would always crust alot worse since like other say it takes the fluff out of the soil. Newer cultivators can all handle residue really well and the finishing attachments have improved greatly compared to 20 years ago. We have tried different attachments and if you are going to run over corn stalks then I would recommend the three bar coil with roller or go with full coil and pulling a crumbler. On rocks, discs are no fun to straighten out blades and cultivators you can run shallow if needed. Not sure what type of soil or previous residue you are working but a Lemken is another type of tillage to consider.

http://lemken.com/en/products/stubble-cultivation/rubin/
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Buck S
Posted 5/24/2013 21:28 (#3115935 - in reply to #3115673)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator



McLeod County, MN
How about a strip till bar?? I had heard a coulter type machine like the soil warrior doesnt bring out very much stone.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
rank
Posted 5/24/2013 22:00 (#3115997 - in reply to #3115813)
Subject: RE: Disk-vs-field cultivator


SEON
wstickel - 5/24/2013 20:39

rank - 5/24/2013 20:37

wstickel - 5/24/2013 19:23
..... lets hear some valid fact based arguments for one over the other.

Time and money spent maintaining a disk are higher.....WAY higher if you have rocks.


But how does it compare to time and money spent picking stone?

Hitting stones costs parts and labor. Picking stones costs labor.

Edited by rank 5/24/2013 22:01
Top of the page Bottom of the page
NEILFarmer
Posted 5/24/2013 22:02 (#3116001 - in reply to #3115673)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator


Morris, IL
We have used disc for primary spring tillage for 10 years or so after a 19' bush hog finisher with 5 bar dump rate that dates back before my time. Added a field cultivator three years ago, took a while to get use to what it can do but now it is the tool of choice if we can get residue to flow. Field cultivator seems to do a more even job, not ridging but lumpiness and moisture level. It is also 20% wider then disc and if i can stay in the seat, 8-9 mph is no problem where disc we have to limit to 6 mph or so. Personally i like fall strip till more then all the tillage tools in the world but when working with family we still do some of both.

As far as the disc if for building roads, 4wd tractor running 2-3 times over a field do that same thing and then some. That is truly one of the main reasons i like fall strip till, seedbed is so mellow it's not even funny.

Edited by NEILFarmer 5/24/2013 22:03
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Big Ben
Posted 5/24/2013 23:43 (#3116161 - in reply to #3115997)
Subject: RE: Disk-vs-field cultivator


Columbia Basin, Ephrata, WA
rank - 5/24/2013 20:00

Hitting stones costs parts and labor. Picking stones costs labor.


... and parts and fuel and...



Edited by Ben in the Basin 5/24/2013 23:44




(rock pile with loader and picker.jpg)



Attachments
----------------
Attachments rock pile with loader and picker.jpg (32KB - 723 downloads)
Top of the page Bottom of the page
funfarmr
Posted 5/25/2013 00:22 (#3116180 - in reply to #3116161)
Subject: RE: Disk-vs-field cultivator


Ohio
Ben in the Basin - 5/24/2013 23:43

rank - 5/24/2013 20:00

Hitting stones costs parts and labor. Picking stones costs labor.


... and parts and fuel and...



THAT Sir is a HUGH JASS rock pile....
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Tommy
Posted 5/25/2013 05:55 (#3116249 - in reply to #3115673)
Subject: RE: Disk-vs-field cultivator


Iowa
1) pick up your rocks/ problem solved
2) discs make slabs/ribbons in many soils even when those soils are fit for a field cult
3) discs make ridges if not continually watched by a good operator
4) discs take MUCH more maintenance
5) disc blades break in rocks
6) discs PACK

In "flat and black" corn belt soils, discs belong out back in the fence row FOR SURE. If we were still discing in 2013, we wouldn't have hardly any fieldwork done. I doubt we've had a day this spring that the soils have been dry enough not to slab like crazy; a disc this spring would have ruined every seedbed it touched.

Machinery technology has moved beyond the disc. We left discs and 125 bu corn back in the '70's.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Big Ben
Posted 5/25/2013 09:14 (#3116543 - in reply to #3116180)
Subject: RE: Disk-vs-field cultivator


Columbia Basin, Ephrata, WA
funfarmr - 5/24/2013 22:22

THAT Sir is a HUGH JASS rock pile....


It's getting there. It's taken us two years to get it that big.

I should mention that we use disks for almost all tillage. They work well on our soils, and a Wishek is about the only tool that will survive some of this ground without breaking right away. A chisel plow and field cultivator work well to bring the rocks up for picking.

Top of the page Bottom of the page
ayrporte
Posted 5/25/2013 10:24 (#3116654 - in reply to #3116249)
Subject: RE: Disk-vs-field cultivator


Eastern Ont
Tommy - 5/25/2013 05:55 1) pick up your rocks/ problem solved

Tommy

Thats all well and good

But the frost action brings a new crop of rocks every year

Cant pick what we dont see

We tried an RTS the last couple of years, they work OK,

Tried an Amazone this spring, we were impressed

http://www.amazone.net/572.asp
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Alberta Farmer
Posted 5/25/2013 11:48 (#3116757 - in reply to #3115803)
Subject: RE: Disk-vs-field cultivator



West Central Alberta Coldest, wettest edge

I won't use the word study, as it is only observational.  But when it is wet in the spring, I use a disc very sparingly, and If I do parts of a field with a disc, all summer I can see the drastic difference, and the line is not gradual, it is exactly where the disc ended.  But that may be a here thing too.  Best tool here is a plow, the only uncompactor I have.  Do a perfect job of plowing, and no other tool is required.

Top of the page Bottom of the page
funfarmr
Posted 5/25/2013 14:21 (#3116933 - in reply to #3116757)
Subject: RE: Disk-vs-field cultivator


Ohio
Alberta Farmer - 5/25/2013 11:48

I won't use the word study, as it is only observational.  But when it is wet in the spring, I use a disc very sparingly, and If I do parts of a field with a disc, all summer I can see the drastic difference, and the line is not gradual, it is exactly where the disc ended.  But that may be a here thing too.  Best tool here is a plow, the only uncompactor I have.  Do a perfect job of plowing, and no other tool is required.



Plows, as in mold board plows, are obsolete around here. Theres a select few people that use them. I'm young enough (20) that i don't ever remember us plowing. I remember probably 10 or so years ago we got it out to tear up an alfalfa field. Neither plow has been out of the barn since. We have a no till drill now and just no till beans into the allfalfa VS tearing it up. Even the chisel plow hardly gets used since we strip till all the corn ground.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Gerald J.
Posted 5/25/2013 20:53 (#3117487 - in reply to #3115790)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator



1. Spring plow parallel to the fences.
2. Disk 30 to 45 degrees from the plow furrows
3. Disk disk 60 to 90 degrees from the previous disk passes
4. Disk (before adding the spring tooth on the back of the disk) at a different angle then the previous disk passes
5. FC with spring tooth either parallel or at right angles to the planned rows.
6. Plant parallel to the fences.

Gerald J.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ayrporte
Posted 5/25/2013 22:23 (#3117694 - in reply to #3117487)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator


Eastern Ont

Have you got shares in a fuel company?

Top of the page Bottom of the page
funfarmr
Posted 5/26/2013 00:48 (#3117846 - in reply to #3117694)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator


Ohio
ayrporte - 5/25/2013 22:23

Have you got shares in a fuel company?



My thoughts exactly. I would think the soil would be powder after all of that.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
rank
Posted 5/26/2013 18:01 (#3119146 - in reply to #3117846)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator


SEON
funfarmr - 5/26/2013 00:48

ayrporte - 5/25/2013 22:23

Have you got shares in a fuel company?



My thoughts exactly. I would think the soil would be powder after all of that.

He is spring plowing...presumably to reduce erosion but I won't put words in Gerald's mouth. I moldboard old sod in July - Aug after hay is taken off then plant wheat Sept 15 - 21. I do the same thing without the FC. The FC just brings the sod back up. It takes that much disking to get the sod broke up. 6" of gravely clay loam on bedrock here.

Edited by rank 5/26/2013 18:01
Top of the page Bottom of the page
ayrporte
Posted 5/26/2013 19:27 (#3119300 - in reply to #3119146)
Subject: Re: Disk-vs-field cultivator


Eastern Ont

Try an amzone or lemken

Usuallly one pass 2 at the most

Keeps the stones down

http://www.amazone.co.uk/agricultural-products.aspKompaktscheibenegge Catros

Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)