AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (69) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Ultra shift vs Auto Transmissions
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page]
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Machinery TalkMessage format
 
NDFarmboy
Posted 2/21/2013 17:55 (#2916033)
Subject: Ultra shift vs Auto Transmissions


Looking at buying a truck was wondering what the difference between a auto trans and a ultra shift. Don't know much about either one. It would be in a triple axle straight truck for hauling from the field to the farm and to town. Is one better than the other as far as workbility or realiability. Want to be sure it is NAT approved before I purchase one! Also, what do some of you suggest for makes, models, engines,etc. TIA
Top of the page Bottom of the page
durallymax
Posted 2/21/2013 18:09 (#2916070 - in reply to #2916033)
Subject: Re: Ultra shift vs Auto Transmissions


Wi
Automatic will be an Allison and will drive like any other automatic.

Autoshift has clutch. It will be an Eaton.

Ultrashift has no clutch. Also an Eaton

Freedomline (Meritor), and I-Shift(Volvo) are also automated manuals.

Advantages to both. Ultra is tough to "inch" but if you are missing a left leg it can be nice.

Personally I am a KW fan and prefer a C15/3406. Cummins is my next choice since KW didn't use many Detroits. The 60 series is an efficient engine that is cheap the rebuild if needed. Cat will cost the most to rebuild, Cummins will be in the middle.

The reason I choose KW is equally service, comfort and quality. I have a high standard to all three of those. Some people do not. In that case many trucks will fit your bill. I will say Mack/Volvo tend to be pricey to work on with slow parts. Pete/KW tend to keep things common over the years which is nice. Nothing wrong with a good ol freightshaker either. Many people also like their sterlings too. They aren't around anymore, but parts come through Daimler.

Edited by durallymax 2/21/2013 18:16
Top of the page Bottom of the page
8430Aaron
Posted 2/21/2013 18:11 (#2916077 - in reply to #2916033)
Subject: RE: Ultra shift vs Auto Transmissions


Dennison, IL

I have the ultra shift in a Mack semi, but if I had a choice I'd rather have a clutch in there.  It works fine though.  Ultra shift would shine with inexperienced operators.

Top of the page Bottom of the page
WillB
Posted 2/21/2013 18:12 (#2916078 - in reply to #2916033)
Subject: RE: Ultra shift vs Auto Transmissions


Ontario Canada
NDFarmboy - 2/21/2013 17:55

Looking at buying a truck was wondering what the difference between a auto trans and a ultra shift. Don't know much about either one. It would be in a triple axle straight truck for hauling from the field to the farm and to town. Is one better than the other as far as workbility or realiability. Want to be sure it is NAT approved before I purchase one! Also, what do some of you suggest for makes, models, engines,etc. TIA


Ultrashift is an automated manual, a wannabe Mack/Volvo mDRIVE/iSHIFT. And the auto is just like in your car or truck.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
pknoeber
Posted 2/21/2013 18:17 (#2916097 - in reply to #2916078)
Subject: RE: Ultra shift vs Auto Transmissions


SW KS, near Dodge City
WillB - 2/21/2013 18:12

NDFarmboy - 2/21/2013 17:55

Looking at buying a truck was wondering what the difference between a auto trans and a ultra shift. Don't know much about either one. It would be in a triple axle straight truck for hauling from the field to the farm and to town. Is one better than the other as far as workbility or realiability. Want to be sure it is NAT approved before I purchase one! Also, what do some of you suggest for makes, models, engines,etc. TIA


Ultrashift is an automated manual, a wannabe Mack/Volvo mDRIVE/iSHIFT. And the auto is just like in your car or truck.


You've got that a little mixed up. Auto shift has a clutch, and then uses the computer and solenoids to do the shifting. Ultrashift doesn't have a clutch in the cab.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
8430Aaron
Posted 2/21/2013 18:18 (#2916099 - in reply to #2916078)
Subject: RE: Ultra shift vs Auto Transmissions


Dennison, IL

I have to disagree.  It is not like your car or truck.  I believe it has a centrifugal clutch that will engage at a low rpm.  There is no torque converter.  The only difference between the two is just that.  There is not much feathering with the ultrashift.

Top of the page Bottom of the page
WillB
Posted 2/21/2013 18:27 (#2916129 - in reply to #2916097)
Subject: RE: Ultra shift vs Auto Transmissions


Ontario Canada
pknoeber - 2/21/2013 18:17

WillB - 2/21/2013 18:12

NDFarmboy - 2/21/2013 17:55

Looking at buying a truck was wondering what the difference between a auto trans and a ultra shift. Don't know much about either one. It would be in a triple axle straight truck for hauling from the field to the farm and to town. Is one better than the other as far as workbility or realiability. Want to be sure it is NAT approved before I purchase one! Also, what do some of you suggest for makes, models, engines,etc. TIA


Ultrashift is an automated manual, a wannabe Mack/Volvo mDRIVE/iSHIFT. And the auto is just like in your car or truck.


You've got that a little mixed up. Auto shift has a clutch, and then uses the computer and solenoids to do the shifting. Ultrashift doesn't have a clutch in the cab.


Thanks.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Gerard
Posted 2/21/2013 18:58 (#2916224 - in reply to #2916033)
Subject: RE: Ultra shift vs Auto Transmissions



Woodham, Ontario
I have an Allison auto in our feedtruck, a 2012 International Workstar with a 475 HP MaxxForce13 with a Penta TMR mixer. The transmission is very similar to a pickup truck. put it in drive and press the gas pedal. No clutch. You can keep it in any gear you want. It's easy, not sure if it is the most efficient on the road, but it works great for feeding.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
collegeboy
Posted 2/21/2013 19:19 (#2916273 - in reply to #2916070)
Subject: Re: Ultra shift vs Auto Transmissions



Slicker than a Yes album.
How does the Ultrashift Plus enter into the scene? What's different from the old Ultrashift?
Top of the page Bottom of the page
dmswil
Posted 2/21/2013 19:44 (#2916345 - in reply to #2916224)
Subject: RE: Ultra shift vs Auto Transmissions



mascoutah, IL
We have a columbia with an ultrashift. I personally like it but I have never driven a manual in a semi so I have nothing to compare it to. You can shift it manually on the column if you need to get a load out of the field. It makes it very easy to learn. The "real" truckers will flame you for it but I don't claim to be a real trucker and with only driving 6-7000 miles a year I'm not sure I'd be that sharp anyway.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
danwarner
Posted 2/21/2013 20:10 (#2916424 - in reply to #2916345)
Subject: RE: Ultra shift vs Auto Transmissions


MN
+1 to exactly what dmswil said
Top of the page Bottom of the page
olwhda
Posted 2/21/2013 20:45 (#2916518 - in reply to #2916345)
Subject: Re: Ultra shift vs Auto Transmissions


Liberty, MO
Only comment I will make is the clutch, no pedal in cab can be quite expensive to rebuild or replace , but will last a long time if not slipped much, I,m driving an Eaton-Fuller Auto-shift in my Volvo, old fashioned I guess.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Teddynormous
Posted 2/21/2013 20:49 (#2916535 - in reply to #2916033)
Subject: Re: Ultra shift vs Auto Transmissions


Dell Rapids, SD
dmswil, has stated it perfectly! The Columbia with an Ultrashift with a small cummings would be a great truck for your purpose. Some guys will only drive a Peterbuilt with 500 hp and a sleeper with a 43 ft trailer but I think they are doing it to makeup for a shortfall in there pants.
Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1
Now viewing page 1 [50 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)