| CFllg - 11/13/2026 14:38
Where in your mind thought there was any attack in anything I said!
BTW, note the lack of any attempt at answering my technical points against your statements. A whole thread of nothing could have been a avoided if you would have stuck to the answering the questions. I knew you couldn't. That was my point.
If it goes to the moon, it's not because of divergence or a golden cross. To be honest I would doubt those things to get used much at all anymore. IMHO, They are likely used by people stuck in their ways that don't want to do the work, to test their statistical relevance, and because they sound cool, then they get used. It's a moving average cross. It's not sexy but make it a golden cross well now you got something! Still the same blah results but it's golden somehow. Same with the 50 100 and 200 day averages. They get touted alot by brokers but I doubt the majority of the funds care at all about them. They were designed back pre computer days because it was time consuming to do intensive math repeatedly. Today a PC and run through a years worth of hand calculations in a second. But it's sounds good and it's in the books so use it I guess
Take care
|
grains
