| CFllg - 11/13/2026 13:21
First of three golden crosses up. There is also divergence at the low. I could talk more of the deeper technicals but it’s over your head. I am only out very basic for your understanding level.
Good thing you kept it basic Vince as every reason you mentioned that supports us going to the moon,....has zero statistical relevance to where price ends up. Done the stats on the golden crosses and posted it here years ago. It works....sometimes. But a trader would have lost their rear trading it. I can't remember the pct but way below 50 pct and that wasn't even shooting for the moon. So the odds would be much less than that. Can you post the data that supports divergence at a low pivot meaning it makes a new moon shot? I have that data. As one that collects that type of stuff I will tell you you are misguided if that's what you believe, but prove me wrong please. If you were using an indicator that matches the frequency of the swing in the market, then the statistical relevance is much higher. Just think of how much divergence has been on the chart on the equity charts for years. Thats been working well trying to sell that the last decade. Silver another one with has the roads littered with carcasses of people selling because of divergence.... If price is going to the moon, it's not because of those reasons.
Cue the personal attacks....
Take care |
grains
