AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Case magnums
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Machinery TalkMessage format
 
Jim Naden
Posted 1/2/2021 09:29 (#8715850 - in reply to #8715749)
Subject: RE: Case magnums



Southeastern Tipton County, Indiana

Hilltop Husker - 1/2/2021 09:52 The front frame matters to me in terms of "frame size". That is where the maneuverability comes or goes. That is where the new "magnums" suffer from reduced visibility. I don't know anyone who ever tore the rear end out of a puma. So it must have enough heft to work. Why case made a frame you can't see the inside two rows because it's too wide is beyond me.


From a service tech position and with these tractors, "Frame Size" is always in reference to the drive train, input shaft back.

Let's go back to the old IH tractors. A 656 and a 756 had the same frame rail widths and shared attaching point dimensions for front implements. But, due to drivetrain differences a 656 is a "small frame" Farmall and a 756 is a "large frame" Farmall.

BTW, blame the bulbous nose on the new tractors on emissions and the added cooling needed due to the emissions requirements.

Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)