|
| Again prove everyone wrong then, real simple to end the repeated arguments on here, show us a tag with the variety number to prove it is not what was stated above, crickets on that I am sure. And it is not 1-FIRST Trial as you stated it is multiple years, multiple trails, multiple locations. It was actually in the FIRST Trial in the 2012 drought year also and was tops then as well as last year and again this year.
Here just like the FIRST trials say:
https://onlinebanking.giffordbank.com/olb.OnlineBanking.PublicFiles.... (1,2,3,4)
http://www.montgomerycountyfb.com/news/images/MCYLCornPlotResults20... (1,2,3,5)
http://www.firstseedtests.com/Reports/2014/B2014ILECsummary.pdf (5 of top 6) could be more.
That being said nothing against the hybrid as it is as good as we have seen in a number of years! This will be our 3rd year of planting it (started after the 2012 independent results we saw, but we don't care whose bag it comes in but this year especially we will be buying the cheapest one.
And for the record we are an advocate that to enter any trial 3rd party trial like above, a company must provide the actual Variety number of the hybrid
to enter for publication. But we all know that will not happen because there would be no more trials.
| |
|
Wyffels corn
