AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (119) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Is 4,000 feet above sea level really a mountain or just a tall hill?
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> AgTalk CafeMessage format
 
sparrell
Posted 6/16/2019 18:20 (#7562892 - in reply to #7562566)
Subject: RE: Is 4,000 feet above sea level really a mountain or just a tall hill?



4640 - 6/16/2019 15:06

I think I could handle the climb from 500' to 1,800' fairly easy. But I know I would be one almost dead dude trying to start at 5,000' and going to 6,300' . I know I get all out of breath and tired just trying to put on skies at the top of the mountains in Colorado. I'm not really trying to argue I just am always intrigued with how the altitude messes with everything. If we can get away we like to go to Colorado couple times a year. It seems I'm never quite as prepared as I think am for the altitude difference.


Not trying to argue either, but from my experience even 6300’ is not enough to even notice any hint of body changes from altitude.

I hiked Harney peak (7200’) in SD carrying 3 year old on my back and didn’t notice any difference from carrying him around at home (~1000 ft).
Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)