rank - 1/14/2019 10:34 Nutiller - 1/14/2019 09:30 Deceased 10/2017 Potash applied 12/17 post death land at that time in an estate. since passed to heirs. 2018 new tenant production. 1 and out. well in that case......I suppose someone could make the argument that since the landlord died the landlord no longer owned the property and tenant 1 applied fertilizer on someone else's land without a rental agreement. In other words, he took a chance. So far everyone that replied agrees (a rare event indeed ) that tenant 2 owes nothing. It's a matter to be settled between the estate and tenant 1. I am inclined to say that since the landlord died prior to the application, there is no rental agreement in place and therefore tenant 1 is owed nothing from anyone. . It depends, some rental contracts state that the contract is binding on the heirs. At that late date, in December that implies the current tenant has the right to farm it in 2019. If the heirs have now sold the land, then the heirs would be liable to the previous tenant, for fertilizer applied in anticipation for the next year. It depends on how much the dollar amount is, if worth hiring an atty. |