coup - 1/13/2019 19:03
gofurit - 1/13/2019 11:02
Until it doesn't.
Almost all of that Becks stuff has been done by non biased university studies and disproved years ago.
Stick with what you know.
Basic agronomy pays. The rest is noise.
What do believe is basic agronomy and what is not?
So your saying Becks is untruthful about their results when it comes to something like Dextrose or ATS. What do they have to gain buy showing positive results on Dextrose in furrow and 1 gal ATS in 2x2?
In their side dress study with 5 gal ATS@ showed negative results. Looks to me like they are publishing what reality is.