|
SC Wisconsin | Thanks for sharing. Your approach sounds very familiar to how I 'tweak' rates with the final pass on corn.
In my observations with one season (2017), Adapt-N and Fieldview, neither is doing all that much better than MRTN in getting the rate right when we have a rate trial in that field. Riding in the combine while taking off the plots I am convinced the spatial variability is too high for the current models to get the job done as stand alone platforms. Models plus an active sensor is where I think things may need to go to narrow the rate range we get with MRTN. | |
|
Do your N rates = MRTN?
