Viewing a thread - Ear weights were estimated

Forums | Classifieds (85) | Skins | Language

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Ear weights were estimated	View previous thread :: View next thread
Forums List -> Market Talk	Message format

Posted 8/11/2017 16:23 (#6181062 - in reply to #6181010)
Subject: RE: Nope. They were implied not estimated

Don't know if this is the right way to do it, but .325/.344 X 169.5 = 160.14 bu./acre.

Top of the page

Bottom of the page

Ear weights were estimated - eastndfarmer : 8/11/2017 14:03
- RE: Ear weights were estimated - Centuryfarm : 8/11/2017 14:19
- RE: Ear weights were estimated - Just saying : 8/11/2017 14:20
  - RE: Ear weights were estimated - Gcc59 : 8/11/2017 14:42
    - RE: Ear weights were estimated - flips : 8/11/2017 14:44
    - RE: Ear weights were estimated - Gcc59 : 8/11/2017 14:45
      - RE: Ear weights were estimated - Centuryfarm : 8/11/2017 14:56
      - RE: Ear weights were estimated - WIJDW : 8/11/2017 16:29
    - 3 reasons why the report was actually kind of bullish - Tech-freak : 8/11/2017 14:57
      - RE: 3 reasons why the report was actually kind of bullish - c-xr-1 : 8/11/2017 15:04
        
        RE: 3 reasons why the report was actually kind of bullish - Centuryfarm : 8/11/2017 15:09
      - RE: 3 reasons why the report was actually kind of bullish - Dan Michigan : 8/11/2017 15:59
        
        RE: 3 reasons why the report was actually kind of bullish - DW11 : 8/12/2017 08:32
        
        RE: 3 reasons why the report was actually kind of bullish - cornncows : 8/12/2017 12:28
    - RE: Ear weights were estimated - Just saying : 8/11/2017 15:45
- Nope. They were implied not estimated - ImTheBoss : 8/11/2017 15:25
  - RE: Nope. They were implied not estimated - WIJDW : 8/11/2017 16:23
    - RE: Nope. They were implied not estimated - Hawkfarm99 : 8/11/2017 16:58

Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)