Viewing a thread - Challenger but not Caterpillar

Forums | Classifieds (36) | Skins | Language

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Challenger but not Caterpillar	View previous thread :: View next thread
Forums List -> Machinery Talk	Message format

plowboy

Posted 12/23/2009 22:37 (#982666 - in reply to #982657)
Subject: Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar

Brazilton KS

Martin already had the market share established for the Kinze. Converting people to White will take some work, but I'm sure it's possible. Both appear to be good planters to me.

Challenger but not Caterpillar - plowboy : 12/23/2009 12:55
- Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - loran : 12/23/2009 12:59
  - Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - plowboy : 12/23/2009 13:19
- Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - Kelly : 12/23/2009 13:09
- Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - Tim(nj) : 12/23/2009 13:14
  - Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - plowboy : 12/23/2009 13:35
  - Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - Dingaling : 12/23/2009 14:10
- RE: Challenger but not Caterpillar - Fla Veggie Farmer : 12/23/2009 13:31
  - Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - Detroit : 12/23/2009 14:10
    - Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - mf6265 : 12/23/2009 16:36
- yup....nope......Kinda? - Newguy : 12/23/2009 13:44
- Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - nwks baler : 12/23/2009 14:16
  - Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - dpilot83 : 12/23/2009 14:27
    - Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - plowboy : 12/23/2009 14:34
      - Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - nwks baler : 12/23/2009 14:55
- That is my understanding. - Tim Cooke : 12/23/2009 14:21
  - RE: That is my understanding. - dave morgan : 12/23/2009 15:52
    - There is a reason for that. - Tim Cooke : 12/23/2009 16:23
    - BTW: Sore subject. - Tim Cooke : 12/23/2009 16:25
- Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - kstate90 : 12/23/2009 14:21
  - Not exactly - Kelly : 12/23/2009 19:43
    - Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - kstate90 : 12/23/2009 21:01
      - Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - Kelly : 12/23/2009 22:33
        
        Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - plowboy : 12/23/2009 22:37
        
        Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - Kelly : 12/24/2009 07:44
- Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - mf6265 : 12/23/2009 16:38
  - Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - rlbsek : 12/23/2009 17:59
    - Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - Kelly : 12/23/2009 19:44
      - Re: Challenger but not Caterpillar - plowboy : 11/5/2013 20:12

Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)