|
southern MN | The original meassage also said:
"He and his father had formed a corporation that owns most of the ground"
Which I take it to mean no individual person owns any or nearly any of the 2000 acres, the corporation does.
That line is what I based my thoughts on. I am puzzled by the line you have focused on, which says the daughter wants to keep her land - but that sounds like in-fighting on who wants what portion of the corporation somehow - I put more weight on the line I quoted.
You don't seem to account for this line at all?
Like we agree previously, we are all just speculating on something we don't need to know any more about, enjoy the different thoughts on here, not worried about this or arguing in any way. :)
All in fun and idle chit-chat to you and the orignal poster and eveyone involved - such idle thoughts can get misunderstood as slams or critizm or so on, none intended at all.
These types of situations are just real facinating to explore, I think most folk feel that way, without meaning anything against anyone.
--->Paul | |
|
estate settlement question
