SW WI | Joelt - 10/26/2025 21:03
That in no way, shape, or form answers the question I asked. If a simple yes or no is within your mental capacity I’ll take either.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump
Carroll's accusation against Trump was more severe than the accusations made by other women. Regarding the jury verdict, the judge asked the jury to find if the preponderance of the evidence suggested that Trump raped Carroll under New York's narrow legal definition of rape at that time, denoting forcible penetration with the penis, as alleged by the plaintiff;[d] the jury did not find Trump liable for rape and instead found him liable for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. In July 2023, Judge Kaplan said that the verdict found that Trump had raped Carroll according to the common definition of the word, i.e. not necessarily implying penile penetration.[e] In August 2023, Kaplan dismissed a countersuit and wrote that Carroll's accusation of rape is "substantially true".
SO Joe according to WIKI the jury did not find him liable for rape, but sexual assault. The judge does say a little different.
Tell me this Joe how many covicted felons have been elected president? Dont think to hard on this. You can use google.
Also the case was a civil matter not a criminal matter. No Trump has never been convicted of rape in a criminal trial or any other elected president.
Edited by swtcorn wi 10/27/2025 02:53
|
Could Trumps attempt to lower beef prices backfire?
