|
|
| I’ve been looking at these but can’t find many reviews. Any experience with any of these? |
|
| |
|
South Central Wisconsin | +1 am curious as well. |
|
| |
|
Southern Ontario | Generally very good, but are a bit light and consequently not the best for soil engaging implements. |
|
| |
|
near dyersville iowa | Thats what I have heard as well. Don't pull as well as the equivalent deere or case. |
|
| |
|
| The m7 seems quite a bit heavier than the 6. The 7-132 seems like it’d be a decent size for 130hp but was curious. I’ve heard the light part about the past models like m126. But new ones are still the same? |
|
| |
|
| Quite a few M6 and M7 tractors in my area. Complaints on the M6, they are light in the rear, need weights and fluid for loader work. If used for livestock, watch for the plantary drop boxes on the FWD to make sure they don't get wrapped with net as it will take out the axle seals. I have an M7-171 that replaced my Case IH 7120. Right at 1000 hours, no complaints, much more manueverable than the 7120, uses less fuel and pulls just as well. |
|
| |
|
| I have a Kubota m6-141. I haven't used it much but I pulled a 5 shank chisel and a 18ft field cultivator. While it wasn't necessarily perfect it pulled it through some clay ground on some hills.
Cab is awesome, everything about it is great. I am sure the 7 series is much more comparable to a Deere or Case if you're looking to do field work.
It's pretty rare to hear people complain about the actually components of a Kubota. We use them for landscape machines and love them. |
|
| |
Kubota m6-141 and m7-132 and 152 reviews
