|
southern MN | showboat - 9/6/2019 08:33
correct.
NOT impossible, but pretty difficult for a "non governmental" business to do. showboat
Ha. That’s funny right there.
Our state they can condem an auto dealership and give the land to an office building developer because that private enterprise is more gooder for all than the other private enterprise.
Running the pipelines first through farmland and deciding what danages are later after the fact is standard operating procedure, you might want to rethink your position here.
Agree or disagree you often have thoughtful comments, I think you are missing on this one.
Paul | |
|
- Crp, pipelines, and land use? - XIX : 9/6/2019 07:41
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - showboat : 9/6/2019 08:25
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - XIX : 9/6/2019 08:32
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - paul the original : 9/6/2019 08:45
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - showboat : 9/6/2019 08:56
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - 1448 : 9/6/2019 09:17
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - showboat : 9/6/2019 09:33
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - emtbd1979 : 9/6/2019 10:22
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - McFarmer : 9/6/2019 11:04
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - DonkeyShowFarms : 9/6/2019 11:08
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - paul the original : 9/6/2019 14:25
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - CMN : 9/7/2019 14:27
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - Cliff SEIA : 9/6/2019 09:45
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - eight : 9/6/2019 17:09
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - NoTill1825 : 9/6/2019 18:20
- RE: Crp, pipelines, and land use? - JRthefarmer : 9/6/2019 18:25
|
|