|
ecmn | Absolutely they could make a bump. One is adding more nitrogen and the other you're bringing in zinc. No doubt at all about a response
I'm just trying to explain how these two products are not good biologicals. unless there is more label we are missing.
The soil life by volume and looking at their ingredients should be almost non-existent by the time the seed germinates. but, To quote Jurassic Park " life finds a way" If conditions are right that tiny bit of life can explode
Companies like AEA, Maxx systems LLC.. They aren't going to have a yield response next to each product. They don't market hype. They sell quality products to help you create a system or fill in some gaps.
If you apply a micronutrient product do you simply just measure yield? or do you measure the micronutrients in a sap test in the plant compared to the control?
If you don't get a yield response, but you measured better micronutrient levels in the treated versus untreated you know the product worked. You just measured and proved that. Something else is holding you back.
If you apply an AMF biological product are you simply going to measure yield or are you going to measure biological standards?
If the biological standards improved the product did what it was supposed to do. That does not automatically mean a yield bump
And that's where with the other two products you listed. If you just measure yield bump, you don't know where the yield came from. If you measured biological standards You would clearly see that. Oh my gosh, these measurements shot up drastically in the treated area and then you know that they contributed to the yield.
Any company that puts a bushel claim on their product should have a money back guarantee. But they won't because they know a bushel claim is nothing but marketing hype. | |
|
Bio seed treatments