|
| But yet in trumps bridge payment, he acknowledges that farmers have bore the brunt of trade disruptions(tariffs) and felt they are deserving of this payment. It was widely acknowledged in his first term tariff debacle that about $1.50per bushel was attributed to his tariff program.
$ .75- 1.00 drop in price per bushel is a fairly conservative estimation based on past history and the Trump confirmation that his 2025 tariff policies directly affected the price for farmers.
How can you not attribute a price deduction based on these factors that resulted in loss of demand for soybeans? Or are you under the assumption that Harris would have had a similar in tariff trade wars resulting in similar outcomes? | |
|
Any insights from Trumps address and where markets are headed…