|
South Dakota | Ultimately, is like more transparency in product performance on bad ground. We can all go look at the university variety trials and the first trials, for the good ground. I think there's a lot of marketing that goes into getting us to rely on the agronomist, that way we trust him and buy more. I believe there a better products for certain ground, but I also believe there's a lot of corn that would never get sold if it wasn't called a workhorse when it actually gets beat everywhere. Furthermore, more research needs to be done on best practices on worst ground, it's all don on deep black soil. | |
|