|
| Let me know what the alternative is.
Like it or not, there is land in places other than the I states. That land laying idle will be the way to lose the most money relative to other alternatives for the owners/tenants of that land. Therefore it will not lie idle.
In our area, when land rent gets down to $15-$20 per acre, putting cattle on it may be more profitable than crops. We've got a long ways to go to get there. So what are you suggesting?
To me it sounds like you want others to cut back so you don't have to. It doesn't really work that way. How about you start first:) | |
|