|
South central Minnesota | all pretty straight forward after reading the judgement. If Larkin had kept his mouth shut and just sued to recover the lost rent he was fine. The quit deeded land was no longer in his control but he affected the relationship there between Emerson and Richards, Richards counterclaim.His disparagement of Richards is what caused the putative damages. Lesson to be learned, keep your mouth shut, win your judgement and let the community form their own opinion of Richards. | |
|