I am steaming mad at this point.  The paper that was published- in a sensationalist journal a.k.a. Nature and it's derivatives - was a pure modeling study.  THIS IS NOT SCIENCE!!! THIS IS NOT DATA!!!

http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate2187.html

This engineer,  though I respect his methods, should NOT claim any of this as accurate, nor relevant ( 100% removal rates, no new technique modeled such as cover crops, etc. ) 

For those looking to find the PI, here is his email - posted on a public website: ANDREW E. SUYKER,   [email protected] (last Author)  Adam J. Liska,  [email protected]  (first Author) 

Please contact me if you need someone to critically review this paper, I'm at bat with this issue.  There is 2 decades (at least) of actual measured data that refute the 'claims', i.e. model predictions. 

This is nothing more than a very expensive GIGO modeling study.