|
| i did not see how it would fly because petitioners were failing to meet criteria necessary to have sufficient cause to obtain waiver...
they now look to a different remedy, ja?
i am reposting info from a month ago i posted here on this forum in case one of you wonder what the criteria was...gottlieb.
Posted 10/14/2012 01:13 (#2639070)
Subject: obtaining waiver on RFS...unlikely by livestock producers
To be granted a waiver, petitioner must show:
1. evidence of severe harm to a state's economy, a region specific area, or the United States
2. harm is caused by RFS
3. waiving RFS is remedy
U.S. livestock operators outsourced Brazilian corn...30 million bushels just recently...this is 5 million more bushels than what the waiver would generate
waiver would increase cost of ddgs and soybean meal
what a waiver means:
corn drops minimum four cents a bushel
corn use for ethanol shaved off 59 million bushels adds: 25 million feed and residual
10 million export increase
23 ending stocks increase
Edited by Gottlieb 11/16/2012 13:30
| |
|
EPA rejects RFS waiver
