|
Central Kansas | A post below was comparing the two products. I am interested in a combination to capitalize on the advantage/ weakness each product has with regard to rainfall required for activation. The way I understand it is that Outlook requires much less precipitation to work effectively. From what I've experienced, Warrant lasts much longer and does a much better job, if there is adequate rainfall. If rainfall is lacking, there is a good chance for escapes.
Is it ok to combine these two? I would likely maintain a full rate of warrant and go with a cut rate of outlook. Conceptually, it sounds like a good plan to me. I could probably do it for less than the cost of fierce.
Btw, this would be for beans | |
|
Warrant WITH Outlook
